Daniel José Santomé Lemus, known online as Dalas Review, is a Spanish YouTuber who has amassed over 11 million subscribers on his main channel. Born on October 31, 1993, in Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, Dalas began his online journey at a young age, delving into 3D modeling and photo editing during his early teens. He later pursued a multimedia degree but chose to discontinue his studies to focus on his online career.
Becoming Famous
Dalas Review’s initial content was all about games, comedy sketches, and light-hearted commentaries on everyday culture. Gradually, he expanded his theme, where he could speak to his audience about nearly all topics under the sun, from social issues to his opinion about other celebrities. This essay has led him into popularity among view followers who find themselves attracted by his audacious stand on sensitive matters.
However, it also attracted some criticism from various quarters, labeling him as being too aggressive and controversial. The controversy between the fans and critics has only amplified his presence in the Spanish YouTube community, and he is a notable figure today.
His channel became a hub for discussion on various topics over time, attracting both widespread praise and condemnation.
Legal Challenges and Controversies
Despite his large and devoted audience, Dalas Review has found himself at the center of a series of legal and social controversies. His inflammatory statements, which often target fellow influencers, celebrities, or even his own ex-partners, have led to legal repercussions. The backlash against his words is not limited to the online realm—legal actions have arisen as a result of his provocative commentary. He has been a target for lawsuits by plaintiffs requesting money damages and public apology for defamation.
This is to emphasize the increasing intersection of social influence online with legal liability. His activities have led to controversies concerning what constitutes the limits of free speech, and his online character led to ramifications to his personal life as well-for instance, protracted litigation.
Defamation Case with Father of Ex-Girlfriend
Among the many high-profile lawsuits Dalas Review’s ex-partner’s father had brought against him, the one that gained much attention was the defamation case he filed, which ended with a Supreme Court ruling in January 2025. The court ruled that Dalas’ public comments in his videos upon his ex-partner’s father were malicious and false, necessitating his financial penalty.
Such an order is quite a reminder that legal risks involved with online content, especially for reputation-related concerns when defamatory statements about a person affect him, and secondly, the deletion requirement from Dalas on the relevant videos and publicly declaring his error reflects the strong hold of reputation for individuals by the legal order, even within the virtual scenario. While Dalas protested the decision handed down to him, he had also started another debate concerning online influencers’ liability for what they create and post.
Custody Dispute Over Dog “Argos”
The dog’s custody over Dalas’ beloved greyhound, Argos, which he co-owned with ex-girlfriend Miare, proved to be the next installment of his controversy-fraught public life. On a first glance, it seemed almost like a stereotypical breakup that had turned grave. However, the custody soon transformed into highly publicized lawsuits. The fights over mistreatments and abuses between both spouses only widened gaps between Dalas and Miare’s families and relatives.
To add to matters, the couples’ families ended up getting included in the mix, making matters even more muddled and even more emotional in nature. The case spilled over beyond merely textual legal resources to social networks, which sparked impassioned fan debates. Dalas was aggressive in getting his dog back, even being very confrontational in the process. The protracted nature of the case and the media attention it garnered have made this one of the most defining controversies of his professional career.
Child Molestation Claims
In 2018, the child molestation allegations led by a 13-year-old girl against Dalas marked a new, disturbing chapter of his life. These claims were widely circulated on social media and invited tremendous media attention as the facts presented seemed serious in content. Dalas retracted the claims as false and misleading and said the interactions had been misrepresented and that the allegations were a malicious attempt to tarnish his reputation.
The case was, however taken to court and Dalas was subjected to public scrutiny as the case went through the court proceedings. Acquittal by the Provincial Court of Madrid due to lack of evidence did not make the divided public opinion change their minds about him. Critics have not yet come to accept his behavior or the reputation that has been accorded to him as a public figure. This incident showed that reputation among online influencers is very fragile, especially when such serious allegations come forward.
Defamation Case Against Wismichu
The defamation case against Wismichu-the most famed YouTuber in Spain-made matters worse for Dalas Review. The video “Así es Dalas Review” made by Wismichu questioned Dalas’ way of behavior after being labeled as deceptive, manipulative, and vengeful. Dalas, infuriated by these public insults, filed a defamation lawsuit against Wismichu seeking financial compensation and a prison sentence. The lawsuit caused a buzz in the Spanish YouTube community as fans of both creators took sides.
However, in a surprising twist, the Spanish court ruled in favor of Wismichu, saying that his video was an exercise in free speech and did not constitute defamation. This ruling proved a blow for Dalas who had established himself in the digital realm as the quintessential blunt commenter but did present an excellent opportunity to once again draw focus on the boundary that exists between freedom of expression and speech. The verdict stood in favor of Wismichu as being an endorsement from the YouTube makers for criticism to occur without leading to a judicial crackdown.
Impact and Public View
Dalas Review has been involved in many controversies which have affected his image and reputation both within the Spanish-speaking online community and elsewhere. His faithful followers continue to defend him, but these lawsuits have portrayed him in a very negative light and have created a chasm between him and the rest of the public. He has become one of the most polarizing influencers because of his aggressive response to criticism and public feuds with other influencers.
His litigation issues, specifically libel cases and battles over custody, have questioned accountability among the creators of digital content. To some, Dalas is an entertaining figure who has been unfairly targeted. Others perceive him as that man whose acts damage the online community. His controversies have sparked debates about the role of YouTube in shaping public discourse and whether influencers should be held to higher standards given their immense reach.
Conclusion
Dalas Review’s rise to fame has been accompanied by significant legal and personal challenges, many of which have been made public. From the defamation lawsuit involving his ex-partner’s father to the custody dispute over his dog, and the controversial allegations of sexual abuse, Dalas has been embroiled in multiple legal and moral dilemmas. These events have highlighted the complexities that come with being an influencer in the digital age, where personal actions can have far-reaching consequences.
His court battles have highlighted the need to understand the legal landscape of the digital space, where freedom of expression has to be balanced with respect for others’ reputations. As Dalas continues to navigate these controversies, his experiences are a cautionary tale for other influencers who are trying to balance fame, free speech, and responsibility in the ever-evolving digital world. Future perspectives on the issues of online influencers and their obligations will remain to be debated further, but a case like that of Dalas can certainly teach much about how legal responsibility might be balanced against social media.
